Home
   
  Terms of Use
   
  Instructor Resources
  Ethics News
  Browse Competency
  Lesson Plan Template
  Assessment Bank
  Activity Bank
  Ethical Reasoning Tool
  Ethics Bibliography
  Links and Resources
  Character Education and Core Values
   
  Primers
   
  Overview
E
valuating Ethics Education
  Teacher Feedback Form
  Student Module Assessment
   
  Ethics Curriculum Project Evaluation
   
  Frequently Asked Questions
   
  History of the Project
   
  Sponsors
   
  Who are we?

Home> Science & Math> Table of Contents>

Freedom of Speech on the Internet

Anne Fiedler, Ph.D.
Development Team

Reviewed 1/08

Introduction
In the fast changing world of communication technology, today’s teenagers are being bombarded by new tools for spreading information and opinions that were not even imagined when the First Amendment was ratified in 1791. Today, text messaging, chat rooms, blogs, and e-zines spew out voluminous amounts of information, much inaccurate, some slanderous. Added to this is the huge popularity of social-networking resulting in over 34 million members on MySpace most of which are adolescents, teenagers, and young adults. Many ethical questions arise from this phenomenon.
View More

Key Concepts and Vocabulary
• First Amendment
• Freedom of Speech
• Accountability
• Communications Decency Act of 1996
• Censorship

View More
Background for for Teachers
The First Amendment right of freedom of speech extends to the Internet. However, the First Amendment originally was only meant to prohibit direct government censorship. This definition has been expanded by the courts over the years, but, freedom of speech does not give a person the right to say anything that they want about a person. Another set of laws deals with defamation (The expression of injurious, malicious statements about someone). When these statements are published, either in hard copy or on the Internet, this is known as libel. To be considered libel by the courts, a statement must be provably false; further, if it is related to a political statement, most courts hold that the statement must involve the intent of “actual malice.” The following case of A.B. v. State of Indiana is an example of how the protection of freedom of speech on the Internet might be viewed by the courts.
View More
Core Subject Areas and Grade Level Description of Classroom Activities 
Objectives from Competency-Based Curriculum Assessment for Activities
Correlations to Language Art Benchmarks (Sunshine State Standards) Extension Activity
Core Values Emphasized in this Learning Module Bibliography and Web Resources

Suggested Time for Instruction

 

 

Print / Full View of Curriculum
Click here to have a complete continous scrolling version of this curriculum for more efficient reading and printing.

 

  Table of Contents
  Introduction
  Core Subject Areas and Grade Level
  Local, State, and National Standards
  Core Values Emphasized in this Learning Module
  Key Concepts and Vocabulary
  Suggested Time for Instruction 
  Background for Teachers 
  Description of Classroom Activities 
  Assessment for Activities
  Extension Activity
  Bibliography and Web Resources

 

About Us | Site Map | Contact Us

Privacy Policy | Copyright © 2005-2008, Youth Ethics Initiative, Inc., and the University of Miami. All rights reserved.